Tag Archives: Eric Moore

Minneapolis Public Schools Administrator Eric Moore Wants Superintendent’s Job

March 23, 2022

Sarah Lahm

We are moving into week three of the Minneapolis teachers union strike. Why hasn’t it been resolved yet?

There may be a surprising answer to that question.

Eric Moore

Eric Moore is the district’s Chief of Research, Accountability, and Equity, and he would like to be the next superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools, according to a series of text messages he sent to Minneapolis Federation of Teachers president Greta Callahan in January of this year.

Moore’s texts indicate he was willing to engage in a quid pro quo with Callahan in order to secure his goal of becoming superintendent, according to district sources that wish to remain anonymous.

Moore has worked for the Minneapolis Public Schools since 2013, after serving as the Director of Student Services and Diversity for Anoka-Hennepin Schools from 2001-2008. In recent years, he has taken on more responsibility for the direction of MPS and was widely regarded as the lead architect (watch from the 1:30 mark for insight into Moore’s views) of the district’s controversial overhaul known as the Comprehensive District Design (CDD).

Text Exchange Between Moore and Callahan

Part 1
Final exchange

Moore: Lead MPS Negotiator

Callahan and fellow MFT members on strike

Moore’s communications with Callahan took place while MFT was engaged in contract negotiations with MPS but before the union’s 3,000+ membership base voted to authorize a strike earlier this month. Now, teachers, support staffers, and district students have been out of the classroom and missing paychecks since March 8 with no end in sight.

Moore, however, is currently serving as a lead member of the Minneapolis Public Schools’ contract negotiations team, alongside outgoing Human Resources director Maggie Sullivan and the district’s labor lawyer, Margaret Skelton.

But should Moore be at the table, representing MPS, when he has expressed his desire to push Superintendent Ed Graff out in favor of his own attempt to become the district’s next CEO?

Sources close to the negotiating process are questioning why Moore continues to be allowed such control over the contract negotiations, especially when Graff was made aware of the texts Moore sent to Callahan. (At least two school board members have also been apprised of Moore’s texts.)

Callahan’s message to Graff
Graff’s response

Internal MPS Chaos Continues

Callahan and her counterpart, Shaun Laden, who heads up the Education Support Professional branch of MFT, reportedly then met with Graff and questioned why Moore was still leading MPS’ negotiations team. Graff indicated that the district’s legal counsel is looking into Moore’s texts and his apparent bid for the superintendent’s job.

There is no further information yet regarding the district’s actions on this matter.

Graff has taken plenty of heat for his role in the seemingly toxic relations between MPS and MFT while Moore has largely avoided the spotlight. But there may be an ulterior motive for allowing negotiations between the district and its employees to persist for weeks: it is putting Graff in an increasingly vulnerable position.

The Minneapolis school board voted 5-4 to renew Graff’s three-year contract last October, but he has reportedly not signed a contract yet. Aside from the challenges brought by the CDD (which district officials reportedly thought would lead to a steep enrollment decline, as it has) and COVID-19, Graff has overseen the city’s first teachers strike since 1970.

Turmoil certainly appears to be roiling the district. First, school board member Josh Pauly suddenly resigned on March 17 (after securing a new job for himself with an outside tutoring company that recently scored a contract with MPS). Then, HR boss Maggie Sullivan announced her upcoming departure from MPS, even as negotiations with teachers and support staffers remain unsettled.

If the strike continues to drag on, with MPS increasingly on the hook for additional school days–which will cost the district more money–Graff may be pressured to resign, ostensibly giving Moore the opening he appears to be seeking.

What was it Abraham Lincoln had to say, about a house divided against itself being unable to stand?

Minneapolis Public Schools Final CDD Plan: Pandemic Proof?

March 26, 2020

What is it like to run a large public school district in a time of crisis? That’s a good question for Minneapolis Public Schools superintendent Ed Graff.

Here’s another question for Graff. What is it like to push a major district redesign plan through in the middle of a global pandemic?

Regarding the first question, Graff received high marks from the nine-member Minneapolis school board during a special business meeting on March 26. The virtual meeting began with board members offering their praise for Graff’s leadership during the Covid-19 shutdown of the Minneapolis Public Schools.

In particular, Graff and his team were acknowledged for quickly pulling together school nutrition and enrichment packet options for families suddenly cast adrift from their school communities.

Graff in turn announced further plans for meal packets to be distributed at various sites over the next few weeks. (Check the district’s website for details, including a distance learning plan that will be made public on March 27.)

During the March 26 meeting, Graff was also granted special powers that will last through the Covid-19 emergency. With the board’s approval, he can now make budgetary decisions, and so on, that relate explicitly to the coronavirus situation–without the board’s approval.

A second resolution also passed, authorizing the board to hold virtual meetings, if necessary, during this crisis. Public comment will still be gathered, but not in person. (Kerry Jo Felder was the lone no vote on this item.)

The how/when’where of this has yet to be fully explained or considered, according to school board chair Kim Ellison.

Here’s why that matters: the district is still planning to vote on its controversial redesign plan, known as the CDD, on April 28–come hell or the Covid-19 shutdown.

That meeting and vote will apparently still be held, whether or not the public can attend an open meeting and engage directly with board members. Feedback and input will still be collected, in a to-be-determined manner, but it will lack the impact (or chaos, perhaps) of recent face-to-face interactions between and among the public and the board.

And so the CDD is likely to become a reality, with board members Ali, Arneson, Caprini, Ellison, Inz and Pauly expected to vote in favor of it. Representatives Felder, Jourdain, and Walser are likely no votes.

Final CDD Available March 27

The long-awaited final version of the CDD will be released to the public on March 27, although the board and some members of the media have had a copy of it since at least March 24.

I have reviewed the document (thanks to a public data request) and will say that it doesn’t stray too far from the five-option model released by MPS in January, although it does contain major boundary changes for many district schools.

There is also very little financial information contained within it, except for a projected five year capital improvement plan worth somewhere north of $224 million.

The Career and Technical Education (CTE) pathways outlined in February, for example, are the same. Programming will be concentrated at North, Edison, and Roosevelt high schools, including an agriculture program at Edison.

K-8s On the Chopping Block

Other hot-button issues include K-8s and dual-immersion programming, and those in defense of both models may not be very pleased with the final CDD proposal.

Popular K-8 magnet programming at Hmong International Academy, Marcy Open School, Seward Montessori School, and Barton Open School will be eliminated, with each of these schools reverting to a K-5 model. (Hmong International is more of a community school with a Hmong language and culture focus; that emphasis will not change under the CDD.)

Folwell Performing Arts, another K-8 magnet now, will also become a community K-5 site.

There will be two new citywide K-8 magnet schools created–one at Jefferson near Uptown and another at Sullivan school in Seward. Jefferson’s Global Studies and Humanities focus sounds (on paper anyway) as if it will be similar to the popular IB programming that is eliminated in the CDD.

Sullivan will have a STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Math) emphasis. Franklin Middle School will also be a citywide STEAM magnet. There are no K-8 community schools in the CDD proposal.

Green Central Community School will become a K-5 Spanish dual-immersion magnet, while Windom (currently an immersion program) is slated to become a community K-5 site.

No Separate Immersion Middle School

Immersion advocates hoping for a standalone middle school option–which MPS indicated could be housed at Jefferson–will instead have to be content with a 6-8 immersion strand program placed within Andersen Community Middle School in south Minneapolis.

Sheridan and Emerson schools will retain their K-5 immersion school focus, while no programming of this type appears to be headed to north Minneapolis, despite board member Kerry Jo Felder’s frequent requests for a northside location.

Bethune and Hall–two elementary schools in north Minneapolis–will be K-5 magnets, for art and STEM (STEAM without the art) respectively. Seward will be the district’s only Montessori option, with a K-5 citywide magnet model.

There is no clear indication as to how all of these new citywide magnets will be handled, from an enrollment, recruitment or transportation perspective.

Got Time to Propose a Specialty School?

A provision for “specialty schools” remains, although the timeline spelled out in the CDD will likely raise a few eyebrows. Global pandemic be damned, any school community wishing to become a specialty school (sort of a magnet school, sans any extra funding or transportation) will need to submit a final proposal by November of this year.

There will be much more to pore over, from March 27 until the scheduled board vote on April 28. Many will find much to admire about the CDD, including the bolstering of North High School with students from an expanded attendance zone that stretches into Kenwood and Uptown.

There is also a lot of language about capstone projects for STEAM school attendees, for example, as well as an admirable–and desperately needed–emphasis on recruiting and retaining more teachers of color.

These positive steps or goals may be weighed down by the sheer level of disruption the CDD promises to deliver, however, which one can guess at despite the lack of enrollment numbers included in the presentation.

There is the promise of a bunch of new schools being created all at once, alongside a major overhaul of MPS student placement and HR policies.

Many communities, in all corners of the city, may be surprised at the level of upheaval they will be asked to endure along the way to securing a “well-rounded” education for their kids.

Super Chickens Don’t Succeed

When the document becomes public, pay close attention to how teachers are discussed. The CDD in fact closely echoes the market-based education reform narrative around “high quality teachers,” as if they are chess pieces rather than human beings. (What makes someone a high quality teacher? Who should define this?)

Strong teachers are attracted to, and help build and maintain, strong schools. They are drawn to and inspired by schools with healthy climates and inspirational leaders. They thrive when they are allowed to be vulnerable without fear of retribution.

This is about culture and community, not the myth of the super chicken (look it up!).

MPS is about to embark on an incredibly ambitious mission. It is one that the CDD’s lead author, MPS administrator Eric Moore, referred to recently as being rooted in a theory of disruption and deconstruction, with the goal of rebuilding a more equitable system from the ground up.

It is a theory, he acknowledged, that has “never worked” yet.

Will it now?

Minneapolis Public Schools Plan Does Not Include K-8 Schools

December 8, 2019

In 2017, New York University professor Elise Cappella made this point, in reference to a study she had just helped conduct regarding middle schools and their impact on students:

“Research broadly supports the idea that K-8 is a better choice, overall,” Cappella said in an interview with Joshua A. Kirsch.

You would never know that by looking at the latest iteration of the Minneapolis Public Schools Comprehensive District Design plan.

On December 8, the district released its latest teaser, offering a look at the direction it is headed while claiming no ownership over the ideas. “It’s just a study,” district representatives keep insisting, regarding the information it has been releasing lately–all while simultaneously outlining a rapid timeline for a final school board vote.

  • Public engagement regarding the district’s various design studies and models will take place in January and February, 2020
  • The school board will be asked to vote on a final Comprehensive Design plan on March 10, 2020
  • The December 8 document is called “Phase 2 Boundary Study Presentation,” to be shared with the school board during its December 12 Committee of the Whole meeting. (There will be no public input at this meeting; those wishing to speak up will need to do so at the December 10 school board meeting.)

The presentation is framed as simply a “what-if” scenario, designed to see the “impact on integration and transportation if all K-8 students attended their community schools.”

And those community schools are only either K-5s or middle schools serving 6-8 grade students. All existing K-8 schools, including Marcy Open, Seward Montessori and Barton Open, are reconfigured in this PowerPoint as K-5 sites, although Seward retains its Montessori programming.

All three schools currently serve 700 or more students from diverse racial and economic backgrounds. Under this MPS plan, or study, those schools would shrink in size and arguably become more segregated.

While the December 8 document is being pitched as just a study–as in, nothing to see here, folks–it fits into an ongoing pattern. Over the past 18 months, MPS administrators (mostly Eric Moore, Chief of Accountability, Research, and Equity) have created and shared PowerPoint presentations that offer a skewed perspective on district data, with information either missing or inaccurately presented.

For an example of this, review either the documents or video from the school board’s November 23 half-day retreat. There, Moore offered a lengthy look at how the district is configured, from a school boundary perspective. (One data point that was missing: the highest concentration of enrollment losses at MPS occurs from 5th-6th grade–but not at K-8 schools.)

Many of the PowerPoint slides he shared, however, were less than fulsome. Slide number 17, for example, bears the label, “Lack of Effectiveness of Magnet Schools, and then notes that “1/3 of MPS magnets lost students of color from 2013-2017.”

But 2/3 of magnets gained students of color–even if these gains were “inconsistent or minimal,” as the PowerPoint slide claims. The gains must mean something–but what? There was no analysis of that, only the perception that magnets–which MPS has routinely claimed–are not working, either for integration or improved student outcome purposes.

Another example comes from the zig-zagged transportation routes shared at the November 23 retreat.

Only magnet school routes were included, making it look as though magnets are an outsized burden on the district, while open enrollment routes (where kids are bused to community schools outside of their own neighborhoods) were absent–even though we know that, particularly in north and northeast Minneapolis, students are bused all over the place as a retention and enrollment strategy.

The key thing here is, as a friend advised me, to think about what story the district is trying to tell, and what conclusions they are working towards. Going back just until the summer of 2018, when the district’s initial comprehensive redesign plans were publicly presented, there is a consistent through-line:

  • Magnets are not working
  • K-8s are not a worthwhile investment
  • The district is easier to map out and, perhaps, manage, using a K-5, 6-8 only plan
  • Shrinking the number of magnets and moving them will save MPS money and naturally promote integration (assuming all kids currently in the system stay in MPS, no matter which school they are assigned to)

It is impossible to say what the purpose of all this is. MPS appears poised to claim that eliminating K-8 schools, greatly reducing magnets (and replacing them with nebulous “specialty schools,” in a nod to the “coordinated uniqueness” pitch that once accompanied these plans), and concentrating greater numbers of students in large middle schools will save money and improve transportation, if not student, outcomes.

But, as far as I know, there has been little if any input here from front line staff, including teachers, support staff, and site-based administrators.

This is a problem.

Without ground-level guidance, this runs the risk of being little more than another top-down, hit and run way to hobble already-strong (or newly emerging) programs rather than learn from them.

Many MPS veterans, including students, parents, teachers, and administrators, have battle scars already, thanks to previous plans that promised big things while failing to adequately consider the insights of those who will be held accountable when things veer off course.

Knowing that middle schoolers, even eighth graders, are still the children who played tag at recess a mere three or four years before, is not infantilizing, but humanizing to the young adolescent.

Claire Needel Hollander, New York City public school teacher